Home / AI Tools / Lindy AI
Lindy AI

Lindy AI

No-code AI workflow automation platform that lets you build custom AI agents and connect them to thousands of apps.

$49/mo - 5,000 credits, advanced triggers, and integrations ~ Moderate Agreement Visit Website ↗

Score Breakdown

7.9
7.8
8.8
Task Autonomy 8.2
7.8 8.1 8.8
Accuracy & Reliability 8.0
7.8 7.8 8.5
Speed & Performance 8.3
8.0 8.0 9.0
Tool Integration 8.8
8.6 8.8 9.1
Safety & Guardrails 8.1
7.9 8.0 8.5
Cost Efficiency 7.7
7.4 7.1 8.5
Ease of Use 8.8
8.3 8.5 9.5
Multi-step Reasoning 7.8
7.6 7.7 8.2

Judge Opinions

Claude Opus 7.9

"Lindy differentiates from traditional automation platforms by using LLMs for contextual decision-making rather than simple if-then rules. The September 2025 Claude Sonnet 4.5 integration measurably improved coding-related workflows. The Computer Use capability sets it apart from simpler no-code tools. However, the credit system ($0.01-$0.10+ per task depending on model) creates unpredictable costs that users find frustrating."

+ LLM-powered agents make contextual decisions, unlike simple if-then automation rules
+ Claude Sonnet 4.5 integration brings measurable improvement to complex workflows
+ Computer Use capability enables browser-based task automation beyond API integrations
+ No-code builder with Agent Builder and Lindy Build is genuinely accessible
- Credit costs range from $0.01-$0.10+ per task — unpredictable for complex loops
- Pro plan at $49.99/mo is steep for casual automation users
- Free tier's 400 monthly credits depletes quickly on multi-step workflows
- Agent reasoning depth still trails purpose-built general-purpose AI agents
GPT-5.2 7.8

"Lindy is a no-code agent builder for business workflows that combines app integrations with optional “computer use” when APIs aren’t available. It’s approachable and capable for common ops/sales/admin automations, but the credit model and occasional support/billing complaints mean you should monitor usage closely and start with small, testable workflows."

+ Agent Builder and templates make it fast to go from prompt to running workflow
+ Large integration/action catalog plus webhooks, schedules, and email triggers
+ Computer Use enables automation in legacy/internal tools where APIs are missing
+ Changelog shows frequent product improvements (retries, versioning, task controls)
+ Useful admin/team features for sharing and standardizing workflows
- Credit consumption can be hard to predict, especially with loops and retries
- Some users report billing/support friction, which is risky for business-critical use
- Complex automations still require careful design and debugging despite “no-code” marketing
- Broad permissions across email/calendar/storage raise governance and security concerns
Gemini 3 8.8

"Lindy positions itself as 'AI Employees' rather than just a tool. It offers a very high-level 'Chief of Staff' experience where you describe a job (e.g., 'Check my emails and draft replies for leads') and it builds the agent for you. It's less technical than n8n/CrewAI but more powerful than standard chatbots."

+ No-code agent builder is extremely intuitive
+ Pre-built 'Personas' (Medical Scribe, Recruiter) accelerate setup
+ Integrates well with calendar/email for executive assistant tasks
+ Learns from feedback loop over time
- Less transparent than code-based agents; 'magic' box behavior
- Can be expensive for individuals compared to DIY solutions
- Limited fine-tuning control for edge cases

/// RECOMMENDED_USE_CASE

"Business users and operations teams who want to build custom AI-powered automation workflows without coding, connecting AI agents to their existing app ecosystem."

Appears In

CrewAI vs Lindy AI vs Sintra AI